What is the EU Article 13? Is it really going to ‘ruin the internet’?

The public responses to the potential meme ban and other provisions of the Copyright Directive draft were far more negative than the reactions to the two data protection laws. Far and wide articles have decried the new legislation which aims to update copyright law in Europe. Many have argued that enacting Article 13 will ‘ruin’ the internet.

Will Article 13 affect video game streamers?

Critics say many of them will simply opt to set up in the US instead. This whole deal is Article 13 of Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the Digital Single Market. Essentially, it proposes to the governments of the EU that they should require sites to host bots that check all work uploaded against a database of copyrighted materials.

Sign up for our daily news round-up!

At one point it had featured pop-up notices on its YouTube video-streaming service warning that the effort could have “unintended consequences”, including the blocking of some of its clips to EU-based members. The law sparked suggestions from its biggest critics that it would end up “killing memes and parodies,” despite it permitting the sharing of memes and GIFs. How to buy a cow YouTube boss Susan Wojcicki had also warned that users in the EU could be cut off from the video platform.

1. Article 13 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market implied a potential ban on memes — and people had a lot to say about it.
2. A revamp of the EU’s copyright rules has passed its final hurdle and will now come into law.
3. It dramatically claimed it would have to block existing videos and new uploads from creators in the EU, and encouraged prominent vloggers to make videos about Article 13.
4. Therefore, the next chance to stop the legislation from passing will be a plenary vote on 4-5 July.
5. The first, mentioned in the open letter from internet heavyweights say the move would put unfair costs on smaller internet platforms.

Why US tech leaders may (quietly) welcome Trump’s win

He suggested the law and believes its criticisms are highly exaggerated. The EU Copyright Directive — or to give its full name, the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market — is Europe’s attempt to harmonize copyright laws across all member states. Rightsholders say that the rules will put an end to the days of pirating music and video online, and ensure artists receive a fair payment for their work. Supporters of the directive include musicians Debbie Harry and Paul McCartney. Certain services are exempted, including non-profit encyclopaedias like Wikipedia, software development platforms like Github, and cloud storage services.

A second part of the draft legislation, Article 11, is also raising eyebrows. This section stipulates that companies like Google, Facebook and Microsoft may have to pay publishers for showing snippets of news articles. Alex Voss, rapporteur of the European Parliament for the copyright directive, for one.

If the AI is good enough to work out the difference between a meme and thieving copyrighted material, Article 13 could work. Because the onus will what is the gartley pattern be on individual websites and internet service providers, they will also face the repercussions. As such, some fear that they will aggressively seek to delete content which is potentially troublesome. They could only do that by directly monitoring all content uploaded to their sites. Some view this as censorship and say it stifles internet freedom of speech.

How Did People Respond to a Potential Banning of Memes?

“Studios tend not to enforce their rights against YouTube gamers in order to avoid the PR implications of being heavy-handed with fans, and because the videos can have significant promotional value,” said Ms Berry. In theory, if Article 13 became law, games studios could tell Twitch and YouTube not to show videos of its games. It dramatically claimed it would have to block existing videos and new uploads from creators in the EU, and encouraged prominent vloggers to make videos about Article 13. These rules apply to services that have been available in the EU for more than three years, or have an annual turnover of more than €10m (£8.8m, $11.2m).

Users can send direct messages and pin posts, as well as find “starter packs” that provide curated lists of people and custom feeds to follow. In a Wednesday post, Bluesky said it had experienced “some technical difficulties today,” but said the service had returned. The service has signed up more than 20 million users, with one million new users joining each day during the past few days, Bluesky said on Tuesday.

That management would then be able to order YouTube to take down or modify the video at their discretion. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The law would force social media platforms to take more direct responsibility for policing uploaded content. Big tech companies will likely put their own, costly solutions in place for doing this. Article 13 is the axi forex broker part of the directive that dictates how copyrighted content — including TV shows, films, videos and pictures — is shared on the internet.

Saveyourinternet.eu has a great tool for finding and contacting your MEP, and has a few prewritten scripts and talking points for them. Phone calls are generally the most effective method, since you know they actually answer them. If you’ve been lurking around the internet recently, you may have seen a lot of drama about this “Article 13” in the EU going around.

Unlike GDPR, this is not in the best interest of users, but rather large corporations with vast amounts of copyright material. Wikipedia blacked out four of its European sites in protest last month, external. It said the rules would make information harder to find online and thus make it harder for its volunteers to source information.